Governance, Communication, and Public Policy
print

Sprachumschaltung

Navigationspfad


Inhaltsbereich

Varieties of Indirect Governance

Beteiligte Wissenschaftler

Prof. Dr. Bernhard Zangl

Fachbereich

Politikwissenschaft

Kooperationspartner

Duncan Snidal, Oxford University
Kenneth Abbott, Arizona State University
Philipp Genschel, Jacobs University Bremen

Kurzinhalt

Governors – domestic, international and private – frequently lack key capacities needed to achieve their policy goals. In such cases, governors must work with or through third parties, rendering governance indirect. Four general modes of indirect governance have been observed and discussed in the literature, although not in unified fashion. These modes are defined, first, by whether intermediaries with sufficient authority are available (cooptation, orchestration) or whether the governor must endow actors with authority (delegation, trusteeship); and, second, by whether the governor can exert hard control over intermediaries (delegation, cooptation) or is limited to soft influences (trusteeship, orchestration). We introduce these governance modes in terms of their analytic similarities and differences, consider the governance problems for which each is best suited, examine their workings and implications, and investigate their stability over time. To illustrate their importance and operation, we draw on a wide range of examples ranging from international organizations, peace-keeping, central bank autonomy to the management of dependent states.